{"id":250,"date":"2013-06-10T21:26:21","date_gmt":"2013-06-10T21:26:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/systemsthink.co.uk\/wordpress\/?p=250"},"modified":"2025-06-24T09:10:42","modified_gmt":"2025-06-24T09:10:42","slug":"pulling-those-threads-tight","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/systemsthink.co.uk\/wordpress\/pulling-those-threads-tight\/","title":{"rendered":"Pulling Those Threads Tight"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In the two previous posts,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/systemsthink.co.uk\/wordpress\/the-red-thread\">The Red Thread<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/systemsthink.co.uk\/wordpress\/making-connections\">Making Connections<\/a>,\u00a0 I wrote about the connections we have with other people and how there seems to often be an inexplicably strong connection to some &#8211; manifesting itself in the way that our lives constantly intertwine.\u00a0 Typical of this is, of course, family connections &#8211; these are to be expected.\u00a0 It is inevitable that we interact with other members of our family &#8211; even if that is only at births, marriages and funerals!!<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->However, I want to concentrate in this post on those connections that are equally strong and long lasting, but which have far less &#8216;reason&#8217; to be there.\u00a0 Some of this reiterates what I wrote in the previous posts &#8211; some updates the thinking &#8211; some is new.<\/p>\n<p>The original Chinese story of &#8220;The Red Thread&#8221; has the Gods pulling the thread tighter and drawing people together &#8211; do we as individuals contribute to strengthening (and\/or shortening) the connections with particular people?\u00a0 Are we ourselves &#8220;the Gods&#8221; &#8211; or perhaps more &#8216;acceptable&#8217; are we the mechanism by which the &#8216;will&#8217; of the Gods is carried out.\u00a0 (Note that here I am using &#8220;the Gods&#8221; to be in keeping with the Chinese story &#8211; this is not to suggest that this couldn&#8217;t be equally true if it was &#8220;God&#8221; rather than &#8220;the Gods&#8221;)<\/p>\n<p>Certainly throughout my life I can think of people that I have actively &#8216;pursued&#8217; in terms of connecting with them.\u00a0 The modern day mechanism is of course &#8220;Friending&#8221; on Facebook, or &#8220;Connecting&#8221; on LinkedIn, or some other way of &#8220;getting close&#8221; within the social networks of the word wide web.\u00a0 There were always &#8220;ways and means&#8221; to accomplish this &#8211; but nowadays it is so much easier and the &#8216;reach&#8217; of the connections is far less bound by geographical limitation.<\/p>\n<p>Alongside those that I have been keen to &#8216;connect&#8217; to, there are also people that I can identify who seem to (for one reason or another) follow me around &#8211; and I don&#8217;t mean in the sense of stalking here!!\u00a0 Again, in some instances these are reasonably easily explained &#8211; but in others you sort of think that &#8216;fate&#8217;, or whatever you want to call it, is most certainly playing a big part.<\/p>\n<p>The connections can be many and varied &#8211; often they are &#8216;professional&#8217; &#8211; by that I mean not just directly work related, but also &#8216;interest&#8217; related &#8211; many of my LinkedIn connections, for instance, fall into that bracket.\u00a0 Sometimes there are people that I see contributing to a thread and I think &#8211; they seem to be &#8216;interesting&#8217;.\u00a0 I use the word &#8216;interesting&#8217; because the precise nature of the &#8216;link&#8217; that forms can be quite varied &#8211; it can be people who clearly have views similar to mine or people who have quite different views that they express in a good and open way.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, this sort of connecting is precisely what the type of networking that LinkedIn promotes is all about.\u00a0 My interest here is not so much in the connections themselves &#8211; more in questions like &#8220;why this person and not that person&#8221; or &#8220;why does this person form a particularly strong connection&#8221;.\u00a0 At a superficial level you could say &#8220;its obvious&#8221; &#8211; you just &#8220;get on well&#8221; with them &#8211; however, that begs the person of &#8220;how did you start &#8216;getting on well&#8217; with them rather than with someone else&#8221;?<\/p>\n<p>Sometimes, I admit, the answers are obvious &#8211; but sometimes it almost seems as though the &#8220;thread&#8221; joining me to someone else is indeed being pulled tighter by something\/someone &#8211; bit like when we were younger and our &#8216;best&#8217; friend would attempt to &#8220;fix you up&#8221; with a date. \ud83d\ude09<\/p>\n<p>An example &#8211; made suitably anonymous to avoid any potential &#8217;embarrassment&#8217;.\u00a0 The first thing that &#8216;connects you with a stranger on LinkedIn is when they post to a thread that you are following.\u00a0 So it was with Gunther.\u00a0 His post, although brief, suggested an open and inquiring mind &#8211; more importantly there was just a suggestion in there that here was someone who shared at least part of my worldview.<\/p>\n<p>LinkedIn (like &#8216;real life&#8217;) concentrates your activities in a number of little &#8216;worlds&#8217; that are frequented by people who share your interests &#8211; I say &#8220;little&#8221; but some are (numerically) the size of a small town, so it is fair to say that we will each only know a few of the other &#8216;inhabitants&#8217;.\u00a0 So, when a person appears in more than one place that you frequent it immediately links you in a &#8216;tighter&#8217; way (and, of course, again this is precisely what LinkedIn is trying to do &#8211; looking at someone&#8217;s profile you see how you are &#8216;connected&#8217; to them &#8211; shared friend; shared interests; etc.<\/p>\n<p>Gunther, who I initially &#8216;met&#8217; in one of the areas that I rarely frequent, turned out to have just one shared group &#8211; other than where we met and, having seen his picture once, I began to notice that it frequently appeared &#8211; commenting in discussions that I had an interest.\u00a0 A number of times I found myself having discussions with Gunther around topics in which we had a shared interest.\u00a0 Then it turned out that we shared interests\/mindsets that were nothing to do with the topics\/groups we belonged in.<\/p>\n<p>(part of this &#8211; it could be argued &#8211; was because like attracts like &#8211; and I wouldn&#8217;t dispute that.\u00a0 However, that does little to distinguish between all those who share similar interests &#8211; there are plenty that I have not connected with)<\/p>\n<p>Outside the professional field, we find the same in the rest of our life &#8211; we share friendships with some of our work colleagues but not others &#8211; we become friends with some of our class mates at school\/college, but not others &#8211; we pursue romantic liaisons with some friends (and some strangers) but not others.\u00a0 Whilst some of the reasons for this can be clear, it is far from a black\/white situation.\u00a0 The romantic liaison, for instance, is a prime example of what might seem like chance.<\/p>\n<p>When I think of the number of &#8220;lucky breaks&#8221; that had to happen to result in me first meeting and then marrying my wife it would seem that (logically) there was only a very small chance of that happening.\u00a0 Some of that we each had under our control; some of it could be seen as being manipulated; by far the majority of these chance events were either not something that we could do anything about or we had made decisions a long time in the past that were necessary to &#8220;bring us together&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>This is, perhaps, the most clear example of the threads being pulled tight.<\/p>\n<p>The final group of people I just want to mention briefly are those who without any effort (seemingly on the part of either myself or them) become part of my life.\u00a0 I&#8217;d like to break that into two groups actually &#8211; there are some who &#8216;suddenly appear&#8217; as if from nowhere &#8211; like a few who have &#8216;connected&#8217; with me online &#8211; and there are others who I&#8217;d like to concentrate on briefly and who fall into the category of &#8220;it would be good to know them&#8221;!<\/p>\n<p>Do we &#8211; can we &#8211; manipulate these interactions simply by &#8216;wanting&#8217; them to happen?\u00a0 I can think of a number of people who were (in my eyes) unreachable for one reason or another, bear in mind that I was and am a bit &#8216;shy&#8217; at initiating friendships, but who were in the &#8220;group of people I would like to know better&#8221;.\u00a0 Again &#8211; that could have been for any one (or more) of many reasons.\u00a0 What links these people together is that they unexpectedly came into my &#8220;reachability&#8221; circle &#8211; working together, making music together or whatever.<\/p>\n<p>Did I manage to pull the threads tighter in those situations?<\/p>\n<p>Not got answers to these questions &#8211; in some cases it would be true to say that I was trying to &#8216;connect&#8217; with the &#8220;unreachables&#8221; &#8211; what puts them in that category however is that I was unable to do so &#8211; until &#8211; something else happened that enabled the connection.\u00a0 In other cases, the enabling happened out of the blue &#8211; &#8220;circumstances&#8221; threw us together one way or another.<\/p>\n<p>This will surely be expanded upon in a future post.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the two previous posts,\u00a0The Red Thread\u00a0and\u00a0Making Connections,\u00a0 I wrote about the connections we have with other people and how there seems to often be an inexplicably strong connection to some &#8211; manifesting itself in the way that our lives constantly intertwine.\u00a0 Typical of this is, of course, family connections &#8211; these are to be &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/systemsthink.co.uk\/wordpress\/pulling-those-threads-tight\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Pulling Those Threads Tight&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[122],"tags":[86,103,110,119],"class_list":["post-250","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ignorance","tag-friends","tag-philosophical","tag-systems-thinking","tag-worldview"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/systemsthink.co.uk\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/systemsthink.co.uk\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/systemsthink.co.uk\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/systemsthink.co.uk\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/systemsthink.co.uk\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=250"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/systemsthink.co.uk\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2940,"href":"https:\/\/systemsthink.co.uk\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250\/revisions\/2940"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/systemsthink.co.uk\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=250"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/systemsthink.co.uk\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=250"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/systemsthink.co.uk\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=250"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}